Family watching TV

The FCC Will Vote on The New 3.0 OTA Standard in November

The new 3.0 over the air TV (OTA) standard is rapidly approaching. With the promise of better coverage for over the air TV and 4K video, many stations have been pushing 3.0 as a way to stand out in the world of cord cutting. Now we know the standard is about to become official next month.

Today the Federal Communication Commission (FTC) announced that they will vote on the new 3.0 over the air TV standard at their November 16th, 2017 meeting. “This will open the door to a very exciting future for broadcast television in the United States,” said Advanced Television Systems Committee President Mark Richer.

This would authorize TV stations to start the move to the new OTA ATSC 3.0 transmission on a voluntary basis. There is protection though for viewers who do not want to spend the money on a new TV or upgrade their box. The FCC rule will require broadcasters who decided to upgrade to 3.0 to simulcast in 1.0 the current over the air TV standard.

That means after you local broadcaster makes the move to the new 3.0 standard you will have an additional 5 years before you would need to upgrade your TV or get a converter box. Now that starts when the move to 3.0 standard happens so we are likely looking at 6 or 7 years before TV stations start to turn off the current 1.0 standard. It seems the FCC is hoping most over the air TV subscribers will be upgrading their device before that happens.

We are already seeing new TVs with the 3.0 over the air TV standard built in as an option alongside the 1.0 tuner. So it is very likely your next TV will already support the 3.0 over the air TV standard.


Please follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more news, tips, and reviews.

Need cord cutting tech support? Join our new Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help.

Disclaimer: To address the growing use of ad blockers we use affiliate links to sites like and others. Affiliate links help sites like Cord Cutters News, LLC stay open. Affiliate links cost you nothing but help us support our families.

17 Responses to The FCC Will Vote on The New 3.0 OTA Standard in November

  1. Avatar
    Michael Smith October 27, 2017 at 11:11 am #

    Hmmm. Will I still be able to use my OTA antenna?

    • Avatar
      Cord Cutters News October 27, 2017 at 11:15 am #

      The antenna is dumb you wont need to change that. Its the card in the TV that decodes the images that needs the update. Yet you get 5 years after they make the switch before they turn off the current standard.

      • Avatar
        Michael Smith October 27, 2017 at 12:34 pm #

        Thanks for the info. Hopefully I can get a better signal with my antenna with my local FOX & CBS affiliates with the new 3.0 standard. Right now, if it is windy, rain or snow those two channels display a lot of freezing and periods of no signal. I do have my antenna positioned in a sweet spot too.

        • Avatar
          Sunflower October 29, 2017 at 10:56 am #

          Look up articles on how to stack or gang antennas and see if that will work for your situation.

    • Avatar
      Phuq_Me October 27, 2017 at 12:41 pm #

      why would you need a new antenna? did you need a new on for the digital transition? No. A UHF antenna form the 1960’s would still work. though probably not as efficiently since those were made to cover channels 14-83. but otherwise there is nothing special about ATSC 3.0 that requires a new type of antenna.

  2. Avatar
    Fred Koot October 27, 2017 at 11:33 am #

    It will years before we see Real 4k. A lot more involved than the transmission.

    • Avatar
      Phuq_Me October 27, 2017 at 12:38 pm #

      broadcast will never do 4K. Give that dream up. At best they’ll do 1080p with HDR. A 4K stream leaves room for basically nothing else.

      • Avatar October 27, 2017 at 12:48 pm #

        1080p HDR is the sweet spot that all the manufactures (except Sony) are missing right now. Currently all hdr content is 4K only however Netflix has indicated it may support In future.

      • Avatar
        TaiPeng October 28, 2017 at 12:00 pm #

        What about streaming? Digital only.

      • Avatar
        Scott Larson November 3, 2017 at 11:09 am #

        HEVC will compress a 4K to the bitrate of a AVC compressed HD stream.

  3. Avatar
    Spencer Karter October 27, 2017 at 12:01 pm #

    November 16 is three days before my 32nd birthday! I hope ATSC 3.0 becomes a reality! I hope we get more reception too! Here in Greenwood, SC we live about 70-97 miles from TV towers in my home DMA of Greenville, SC/Asheville, NC, about 77 miles from Columbia, SC DMA’s transmitters and etc. Make Over The Air TV Great Again! BTW, I don’t like the laws of physics thing but I hope this new ATSC 3.0 via internet gives us TV stations from Charleston, SC (one of my favorite markets in my home state) too.

    • Avatar
      Phuq_Me October 27, 2017 at 12:48 pm #

      No such thing as ATSC 3.0 over internet. ATSC 3.0 is an OTA broadcast standard.

      • Avatar
        Spencer Karter October 27, 2017 at 2:23 pm #

        Are you aware that ATSC 3.0 will integrate OTA and Internet?

        • Avatar
          Phuq_Me October 27, 2017 at 7:01 pm #

          you’re just going to confuse people. yes get people believe that Channel 2 or whomever will sell them internet from 50 miles away.

  4. Avatar
    St Aug October 27, 2017 at 1:05 pm #

    “We are already seeing new TVs with the 3.0 over the air TV standard built in as an option alongside the 1.0 tuner.” Is there a model I can look up?

    • Avatar
      Scott... October 27, 2017 at 5:44 pm #

      Since Spring of this year, LG has been selling TVs with both tuners on board in South Korea in advance of the 2018 Winter Olympics. They announced at CES 2017 in January. None currently available for sale in the US. Look for units to start appearing after the Nov 16 FCC vote.

  5. Avatar
    Vegas Steve October 27, 2017 at 3:44 pm #

    All this for a potential 4k OTA? Sounds pretty crazy when most people can’t even tell a 4k from a 1080 unless you put them side by side. And even then, the differences are very subtle. I suppose HDR @ 1080 would be worthwhile.